Journal of Political Economy
1939 1940 1943 1947 1949 1954 1956 1957 1958 1959 1961 1962 1963 1964 1966 1967 1969 1970 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1982 1983 1985 1986 1987 1990 1991 1992 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Опубликовано на портале: 16-03-2005Bengt R. Holmstrom, Jean Tirole Journal of Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 106. No. 1. P. 1-40.
This paper addresses a basic, yet unresolved, question: Do claims on private assets provide sufficient liquidity for an efficient functioning of the productive sector? Or does the state have a role in creating liquidity and regulating it either through adjustments in the stock of government securities or by other means? In our model, firms can meet future liquidity needs in three ways: by issuing new claims, by obtaining a credit line from a financial intermediary, and by holding claims on other firms. When there is no aggregate uncertainty, we show that these instruments are sufficient for implementing the socially optimal (second-best) contract between investors and firms. However, the implementation may require an intermediary to coordinate the use of scarce liquidity, in which case contracts with the intermediary impose both a maximum leverage ratio and a liquidity constraint on firms. When there is only aggregate uncertainty, the private sector cannot satisfy its own liquidity needs. The government can improve welfare by issuing bonds that commit future consumer income. Government bonds command a liquidity premium over private claims. The government should manage debt so that liquidity is loosened (the value of bonds is high) when the aggregate liquidity shock is high and is tightened when the liquidity shock is low. The paper thus suggests a rationale both for government-supplied liquidity and for its active management.
The Macroeconomics of Specificity [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 16-03-2005Ricardo J. Caballero, Mohamad L. Hammour Journal of Political Economy. 1998. Vol. 106. No. 4. P. 724-767.
Specific quasi rents arise in a variety of economic relationships and are exposed to opportunism unless fully protected by contract. Rent appropriation has important macroeconomic consequences. Resources are underutilized, factor markets are segmented, production suffers from technological "sclerosis," job creation and destruction are unbalanced, recessions are excessively sharp, and expansions run into bottlenecks. While, depending on the shock, expansions may require reinforcement or stabilization, recessions should typically be softened. In the long run, institutions may evolve to alleviate the problem by balancing appropriation. Technology choice will also be affected, with the appropriated factor partially "excluding" the other from production to reduce appropriation.