American Sociological Review
1958 1959 1960 1962 1963 1966 1968 1971 1975 1976 1977 1980 1990 1992 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Linda Brewster Stearns, Kenneth D. Allan American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 4. P. 699-718.
Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Matthew S. Kraatz, Edward J. Zajac American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 5. P. 812-836.
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Jimy M. Sanders, Victor Nee American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 231-249.
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Arne L. Kalleberg, Mark E. Van Buren American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 1. P. 47-66.
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Neil Fligstein American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 4. P. 656-673.
Rethinking Stratification from a Feminist Perspective: Gender, Race, and Class in Mainstream Textbooks [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 23-12-2002Myra Marx Ferree, Elaine J. Hall American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 6. P. 929-950.
Economic stratification and social class occupy a central position in sociological discourse as the core organizing features of modern societies. Yet such economically centered models of stratification often disregard factors like physical violence and the intra-household distribution of resources that shape power and autonomy for all group. Using a sample of textbooks from 1983 through 1988, we examine "mainstream" sociology, that is, the sociology that teachers, students, and textbook publishers have treated as nonproblematic. We show how stratification analysis is applied to class, race, and gender in profoundly unequal ways. Rather than integrating macro, meso, and micro levels of social structure as interactive and mutually determinative in their discussions of race, class, and gender, introductory sociology textbooks segregate stratification processes. They discuss class at the societal (or macro) level of analysis, gender at the individual (or micro) level, and race at a group (or meso) level. We analyze the quantitative and qualitative elements of the coverage of class, race, and gender in indexes, texts, pictures, and captions, and suggest that attention to feminist theories of gender would produce a more integrated, multilevel, and interactive view of stratification.
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Alejandro Portes, Min Zhou American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 2. P. 219-230.
The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 22-07-2003Brian Uzzi American Sociological Review. 1996. Vol. 61. No. 4. P. 647-698.