Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data

Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2004
American Political Science Review. 1995.  Vol. 89. No. 3. P. 634-647. 
Тематический раздел:
We examine some issues in the estimation of time-series cross-section models, calling into question the conclusions of many published studies, particularly in the field of comparative political economy. We show that the generalized least squares approach of Parks produces standard errors that lead to extreme overconfidence, often underestimating variability by 50% or more. We also provide an alternative estimator of the standard errors that is correct when the error structures show complications found in this type of model. Monte Carlo analysis shows that these "panel-corrected standard errors" perform well. The utility of our approach is demonstrated via a reanalysis of one "social democratic corporatist" model.

Ссылки
текст статьи в формате pdf на сайте JSTORE:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-0554%28199509%2989%3A3%3C634%3AWTD%28NT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-U
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Thomas Mun, Francois Quesnay, Eugen Böhm-Bawerk
[Книга]
Андрей Владимирович Верников
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2019.  Т. 11. № 1. С. 129-143. 
[Статья]
Андрей Валерьевич Лукашов
Управление корпоративными финансами. 2007.  № 1. С. 22-39. 
[Статья]
Peter A.W. Lewis
Annals of Mathematical Statistics. 1961.  Vol. 32. P. 1118-1124. 
[Статья]
Randolph B. Cohen, Christopher Polk, Tuomo Vuolteenaho
Journal of Finance. 2003.  Vol. 58. No. 1. P. 609-641. 
[Статья]
Jerry Hausman
Econometrica. 1978.  Vol. 46. No. 6. P. 1251-1272. 
[Статья]