на главную поиск contacts

The Positive Economics of Labor Market Rigidities and Investor Protection

Опубликовано на портале: 11-01-2003
Kyklos. 2002.  Vol. 54. No. 4. P. 557-590. 
Тематический раздел:
This paper presents a positive model which derives the preferences of entrepreneurs, workers, and investors concerning investor and employment protection. It shows that institutional setups on capital and labor markets might be intertwined by politicoeconomic forces. Multiple politicoeconomic equilibria arise from our model. Some countries especially in continental Europe exhibit a corporatist politicoeconomic equilibrium with a substantial protection of insiders on both, capital and labor markets. The more important money is in political decision-making, the more divided the workforce is, and the more globalized capital markets are, the more likely is a capitalist politicoeconomic equilibrium with little employment and substantial investor protection. Our prediction of a negative crosscountry relationship between different measures of labor market rigidities and of competition on capital markets receives considerable empirical support, thus being potentially important for the current debate concerning structural reforms of labor markets and of corporate governance systems.

Ключевые слова

См. также:
Елена Михайловна Авраамова
Общественные науки и современность. 2017.  № 1. С. 86–98. 
Светлана Владимировна Сигова, Александра Леонидовна Кекконен, Евгений Александрович Питухин
Общественные науки и современность. 2016.  № 3. С. 64-74. 
Сергей Вадимович Цирель
TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2017.  Т. 15. № 1. С. 44-67. 
Елена Михайловна Авраамова
Общественные науки и современность. 2016.  № 2. С. 64-72. 
Елена Николаевна Гасюкова, Владимир Владимирович Карачаровский, Гордей Александрович Ястребов
Общественные науки и современность. 2016.  № 3. С. 48-63. 
Екатерина Андреевна Клепикова
Общественные науки и современность. 2016.  № 3. С. 75-90.