Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

A Review and Integration of Classification Systems Relevant to Teams in Organizations

Опубликовано на портале: 26-09-2003
Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2002.  Vol. 6. No. 4. P. 291-310. 
Although the determinants of team effectiveness differ across team types, no taxonomy of teams has been widely accepted by researchers or practitioners. This article reviews classification schemes advanced in the psychology and management literatures, and offers an integrative taxonomy consisting of 14 team types classified on 7 underlying contextual dimensions (i.e., fundamental work cycle, physical ability requirements, temporal duration, task structure, active resistance, hardware dependence, and health risk). The 14 team types are divided into two clustersintellectual work teams (executive, command, negotiation, commission, design, and advisory) and physical work teams (service, production, performance, medical, response, military, transportation, and sports). The discussion addresses the taxonomy's relation to existing classifications, and its role in furthering an understanding of team effectiveness.

Ссылки
http://www.apa.org/journals/gdn/1202ab.html#3
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
[Интернет-ресурс]
Tony Kippenberger
The Antidote. 1999.  Vol. 4. No. 4.
[Статья]
Е. А. Александрова, Татьяна Васильевна Фролова
Директор школы. 2003.  № 6. С. 18-26. 
[Статья]
Michael F. Kipp, Mary Ann Kipp
Team Performance Management. 2000.  Vol. 6. No. 7/8. P. 138. 
[Статья]