на главную поиск contacts

Melding Private and Public Interests in Water Rights Markets

Опубликовано на портале: 21-02-2005
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1993.  Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 69-83. 
The debate over pnvatizing and water markets has moved back and forth for decades between the “I” and the “We” perspectives. Rather than either/or, a balanced “I&We” view of water institutions is needed. West is meeting east in water law. Public interest needs must be satisfied in appropriate decision forums, but marketing may prove a social improvement when used as a supplement. Balancing an “I&We” institution involves establishing an acceptable or tolerable level of interference through judicious mixing of state, common and private property regimes. Third party effects are eliminated as mutual gain arises in a variety of decision forums.

статей http://www.agecon.uga.edu/~jaae/jaae.htm
Ключевые слова

См. также:
D.Gale Johnson
Ф.Х. Цхурбаева
Экономические науки. 2010.  Т. 64. № 3. С. 135-138. 
Daryll E. Ray, James W. Richardson, Daniel G. de la Torre Ugarte, Kelly H. Tiller
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1998.  Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 21-33. 
Wilbur Maki, Richard Lichty
Оксана Николаевна Колинько
George Seperich, James Beierlein, Michael Woolverton