IER Lawrence Klein Lecture: The Case Against Intellectual Monopoly
Опубликовано на портале: 14-02-2005
International Economic Review.
2004.
Vol. 45.
No. 2.
P. 327-350.
Тематический раздел:
In the modern theory of growth, monopoly plays a crucial role both as a cause and
an effect of innovation. Innovative firms, it is argued, would have insufficient
incentive to innovate should the prospect of monopoly power not be present. This
theme of monopoly runs throughout the theory of growth, international trade, and
industrial organization. We argue that monopoly is neither needed for, nor a necessary
consequence of innovation. In particular, intellectual property is not necessary
for, and may hurt more than help, innovation and growth. We argue that, as a practical
matter, it is more likely to hurt.
Ключевые слова
innovation intellectual property international trade monopoly инновации интеллектуальная собственность монополия
См. также:
Экономические науки.
2012.
№ 5.
С. 82-87.
[Статья]
RAND Journal of Economics.
1990.
Vol. 21.
No. 1.
P. 106-112.
[Статья]
Социологические исследования.
2006.
№ 1.
С. 54-64.
[Статья]
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований).
2010.
Т. 2.
№ 2.
С. 96-108.
[Статья]
Общественные науки и современность.
2014.
№ 6.
С. 83-93.
[Статья]
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований).
2018.
Т. 10.
№ 1.
С. 125-136.
[Статья]
[Книга]