Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

A Behavioral Approach to Law and Economics

Опубликовано на портале: 06-10-2003
Stanford Law Review. 1998.  No. 55. P. 1471-1550. 
Авторы расширяют стандартный подход к экономическому анализу права (базирующийся на предпосылках экономической теории), основывая свой анализ на постулатах поведенческой экономики. В статье разбираются аргументы в пользу использования основ поведенческой экономики при анализе права, объясняются существующие правовые нормы и институты, исследуется, каким образом люди реагируют на информацию, и каким образом эта реакция сказывается на роли права в регулировании общества.

Economic analysis of law usually proceeds under the assumptions of neoclassical economics. But empirical evidence gives much reason to doubt these assumptions; people exhibit bounded rationality, bounded self-interest, and bounded willpower. This article offers a broad vision of how law and economics analysis may be improved by increased attention to insights about actual human behavior. It considers specific topics in the economic analysis of law and proposes new models and approaches for addressing these topics. The analysis of the article is organized into three categories: positive, prescriptive, and normative. Positive analysis of law concerns how agents behave in response to legal rules and how legal rules are shaped. Prescriptive analysis concerns what rules should be adopted to advance specified ends. Normative analysis attempts to assess more broadly the ends of the legal system: Should the system always respect people's choices? By drawing attention to cognitive and motivational problems of both citizens and government, behavioral law and economics offers answers distinct from those offered by the standard analysis.

Ссылки
текст статьи доступен на сайте Harvard Law School в формате pdf:
http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/olin_center/papers/abstract236.html
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Rami Zwick, Amnon Rapoport, Alison King Chung Lo, A.V. Muthukrishnan
[Статья]
Richard A. Posner, Eric B. Rasmusen
International Review of Law and Economics. 1999.  No. 19. P. 369-382. 
[Статья]
Siobhan Austen
Review of Social Economy. 2000.  Vol. 58. No. 4. P. 505-521. 
[Статья]
Maristella Botticini, Zvi Eckstein
IZA Discussion Papers. 2004.  No. 1224.
[Статья]
Martin Dufwenbergy, Michael Lundholmz
The Economic Journal. 2001.  No. 111. P. 506-526. 
[Статья]
Kent Greenfield
Boston College Law School Research Paper. 2001.  No. 2001-06.
[Статья]
Andrei Shleifer, David Laibson, Sendhil Mullainathan
[Учебная программа]