Роль СМИ в избирательной кампании
Опубликовано на портале: 27-11-2006
Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2000. № 1 (45). С. 32-35.
There are some interesting peculiarities concerning the mass media's influence on the electorate. The existing multiplicity of information sources does not permit the total manipulation of the voters in favor of a certain politician or party. Characteristically, the voters, already disposed in their preferences, look for their favorite in the mass media. This is illustrated by the responses to the question: «Which politicians have captured your attention and stick in your memory with their actions in the last two weeks?». Most people identified the politician they supported. And, most interestingly. V, Putin, who received the most publicity and was in the very center of events, did not lead in any of (he electorates except those who had difficulty naming their parly of choice. This, however, was enough for him to get the general first place for visibility.
It is, therefore, very difficult to determine to what extent the scandals that were developing in the mass media around the main participants in the pre-election struggle have influenced the already-formed reputations of the politicians. Yeltsin seems to be the main loser as twothirds of those polled expressed outrage at the members of his family and the officials involved in money-laundering while only half of those interviewed were inclined to believe accusations against Luzhkov.
избирательная кампания предвыборная кампания СМИ в России электоральное поведение электоральное поведение в России электоральное поведение россиян
Регион: экономика и социология. 2007. № 2. С. 226-338.
Социологические исследования. 1995. № 2. С. 134-135.
Социологические исследования. 1995. № 2. С. 98-104.
ПОЛИС: Политические исследования. 1999. № 6.
Социологические исследования. 2000. № 12. С. 23-32.
Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены. 2001. № 4 (54). С. 13-26.