Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution

Опубликовано на портале: 03-05-2005
Stanford Technology Law Review. 2002. 
This paper reviews the antitrust treatment of patent pooling and cross-licensing arrangements from E. Bement v. National Harrow, decided in 1902, to the Department of Justice business review letters on the MPEG and DVD patent pools. I examine the factors that the courts identified as pertinent to the antitrust outcome and compare them to the competitive factors identified in the DOJ/FTC Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property. Until recently, the competitive relationship of the patents was not a major determinant of the antitrust outcome in most cases. Instead, the courts have focused on restrictive licensing terms that affect downstream prices. I consider the logic of this approach to evaluating antitrust liability. I also propose an approach to evaluating the antitrust risks of arrangements that combine potentially blocking patents.

Ссылки
текст статьи в формате pdf на сайте University of California, Department of
Economics:
http://elsa.berkeley.edu/users/gilbert/wp/patent_pools100302.pdf
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Benoit Mulkay, Bronwyn H. Hall, Jacques Mairesse
[Статья]
[Интернет-ресурс]
Huimin Cui, Y.T. Mak
Journal of Corporate Finance. 2002.  Vol. 8. No. 4. P. 313-336. 
[Статья]
Paul A. David, John Gabriel Goddard Lopez
Treasury Working Papers. 2003.  No. 01/13.
[Статья]
Kwanghui Lim
[Учебная программа]