Coordination of Organizational Time
Опубликовано на портале: 25-12-2002
The paper starts with a discussion on time, and on how different time reckoning systems have been introduced and used to coordinate activities. The discussion leads to the conclusion that time has become institutionalized and conceived of as a taken-for-granted commodity. At the same time, however, time is socially constructed. We argue that different constructions of time can be escribed using four dimensions (rate, duration, synchronization, and sequence), and that that the construction of time, as far as the four dimensions are concerned, is of importance for the organizing and coordination of activities. Four different coordinating principles (time schedules, levelers, checkpoints, and brackets) are derived from a discussion on the four dimensions. Thereafter five empirical examples on coordination of time are presented. The empirical examples are used to further analyze the coordinating principles and suggest a comprehensive understanding of the when-question.
Strategy Unit Harvard University Working Paper. 2001. No. 02-05.
DRUID Working Paper. 1999. No. 99-5.
The role of climate and socialization in developing interfunctional coordination (Роль климата и социализации в развитии межфункциональной координации)
The Learning Organization: An International Journal. 2002. No. 1. P. 29 - 38 .