на главную поиск contacts

Site comparison method (SICOM) – a tool to generate maps and tables with administrative use as a basis for the evaluation of spatial equivalence of agri-environmental measures (AEM) /доклад на 87 семинаре ЕААЕ, Assessing Rural Development Policies of the CAP, Vienna, Austria, 21-23 April 2004

Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2005
This paper presents a comparative method (SICOM) to evaluate complex site conditions at the level of a Federal State (Brandenburg) and at different areal units. The methodology uses primary site conditions and provides the possibility to objectively compare and judge different ecological questions. Objects with heterogeneous content are pooled in comparison groups. Consideration of the main site characteristics allows a goal-oriented allocation of subsidies. The use of SICOM is demonstrated for the wind and water erosion risk assessment across different scales from Federal State down to a parcel of land. The “parcel” aggregation-level proves to be useful to assess the erosion risk. Larger scales are less useful in the assessment of subsidies policy with regard to erosion risk. SICOM is demonstrated to be suitable for comparing and assessing regional aspects more objectively.

Ключевые слова

См. также:
Surajudeen O. Olowolayemo, Neil R. Martin, Jennie E. Raymond
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 1993.  Vol. 24. No. 2.
Raed F. Hattar, James R. Bacon, Ulrich C. Toensmeyer, C. M. Gempesaw
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 1994.  Vol. 25. No. 1.
Marianne McGarry Wolf
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2000.  Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 198-203. 
J. Michael Harris, Noel Blisard
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2001.  Vol. 32. No. 1. P. 65-73. 
Julie A. Bunn
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1998.  Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 339-351. 
Tesfa G. Gebremedhin, Ralph J. Christy
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1996.  Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 57-66.