Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Institutional Complementarities and Patterns of Collective Action in some Cases of Rural Development Policies/доклад на 87 семинаре ЕААЕ, Assessing Rural Development Policies of the CAP, Vienna, Austria, 21-23 April 2004

Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2005
2004
This paper aims to examine some aspects of the Rural Development policies in the light of the conceptualization of institutional complementarities. Actually, an increasing amount of analytical outcomes emerges in inquiring the relationship between specific institutional arrangements and the kind of economic and social problems they may solve. This suggests that under that view some chances of enhancing the knowledge about rural policy making models may be exploited. Actually, the rural systems constituting the European Rural territory show specific and complex institutional orderings defining a rural institutional field. This field calls for specific analysis and policy models. The market and the State are the main entities taken into account in specifying policy patterns in the Rural Development’s field, whereas a communitarian framework is often considered a rooted characteristic of the European rural development processes. The communities’ constituting processes is often not fully considered in the rural development studies. Even if the scholars have usually recognised a correspondence between Community and Rural System, this correspondence has still to be analysed. The paper would examine some Rural Development Policies (i.e. under the EU regulation 1257/99), by taking into account the roles of the market, the State, and the Community. In particular the communitarian field seems of interest in integrating different policy making levels, thus we would delineate the role of the Rural Development Policies in constituting or fostering Rural Communities. The Hohfeld-Commons analytical structure of rights and duties will be considered to this purpose. Then the analytical framework will be taken into account to delineate some opportunities for future scenarios emerging from the CAP reform.

Ключевые слова

См. также:
Экономический журнал ВШЭ. 2006.  Т. 10. № 2. С. 317-348. 
[Статья]
B.J. Hubbell
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1997.  Vol. 29. No. 2. P. 225-242. 
[Статья]
Paul B. Siegel, Raymond M. Leuthold
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1993.  Vol. 25. No. 2. P. 134-147. 
[Статья]
Marianne McGarry Wolf
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 1999.  Vol. 30. No. 1. P. 156-159. 
[Статья]
Zhikang You, J.E. Epperson, Chung-Liang Huang
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 1996.  Vol. 27. No. 3. P. 11-22. 
[Статья]
Я. Зелёнка
Вестник международных организаций. 2006.  № 5. С. 70-72. 
[Статья]