Deciding Who Lives: Fateful Choices in the Intensive-care Nursery
Опубликовано на портале: 28-11-2006
USA: University of California Press, 1993
Тематические разделы:
|
In this powerful and probing look at the reality of everyday choices in neonatal intensive care units, Renée Anspach explores the life-and-death dilemmas that have fueled national debate. Using case studies taken during sixteen months of extensive interviewing and observation, Anspach examines the roles of parents, doctors, nurses, and bioethicists in deciding whether critically ill newborns--be they premature, terminally ill, or severely malformed--should be saved by medical technology, or at least kept alive a little longer. |
|
|
List of figures and tables |
ix. |
|
Acknowledgments |
xi. |
|
Ch.1. Introduction: the dilemmas and their dimensions |
1. |
|
Ch.2. Theorizing about life-and-death decisions: a critical review |
25. |
|
Ch.3. Predicting the future: why physicians and nurses disagree |
55. |
|
Ch.4. Producing assent: parents, professionals, and life-and-death decisions |
85. |
|
Ch.5. Diffusing dissent: parents, professionals, and conflict in decisions |
127. |
|
Ch.6. Beyond the nursery: life-and-death decisions and paradoxes in public policy |
164. |
|
Appendix1. Field research and the sociology of (sociological) knowledge |
177. |
|
Appendix2. Interviewing |
219. |
|
Notes |
229. |
|
Bibliography |
251. |
|
Index |
297. |
Ключевые слова
child mortality children death life-and-death decisions nurses physician врач дети детская смертность жизнь медсестра смерть
См. также:
Journal of Health and Social Behavior.
1982.
Vol. 23.
No. 4.
P. 366-380.
[Статья]
[Статья глоссария]
Социологические исследования.
2000.
№ 4.
С. 59-65.
[Статья]
Общественные науки и современность.
1997.
№ 2.
С. 170-180.
[Статья]
Personnel Review.
1990.
Vol. 19.
No. 4.
[Статья]