II. Response to Alexander Etkind's review of Marina Mogilner's "Homo imperii: Istoriia fi zicheskoi antropologii v Rossii"
Опубликовано на портале: 14-10-2011
Laboratorium. Журнал социальных исследований.
2011.
№ 2.
С. 94-96.
Тематический раздел:
Aleksander Etkind’s review of Marina Mogilner’s book raises a broader issue about how histories of ideas and particularly histories of scientifi c and scholarly theories are and should be written. Etkind depicts what he believes is the dominant and the only productive approach to writing a history of scholarly thought. He then critically assesses Mogilner’s work against his own construct. In my comments I will fi rst question Etkind’s perception of the current state of the historiography of scientifi c thought and then will try to show how it leads to a misrepresentation of what Mogilner has tried to do.

text
[42 КБ]
[42 КБ]
Ключевые слова
См. также:
[Учебная программа]
Laboratorium. Журнал социальных исследований.
2013.
№ 2.
С. 219-222.
[Статья]
[Диссертация]
[Учебная программа]
[Книга]
Laboratorium. Журнал социальных исследований.
2012.
№ 2.
С. 183-188.
[Статья]
Laboratorium. Журнал социальных исследований.
2012.
№ 3.
С. 148-150.
[Статья]