II. Response to Alexander Etkind's review of Marina Mogilner's "Homo imperii: Istoriia fi zicheskoi antropologii v Rossii"

Aleksander  Etkind’s  review  of  Marina  Mogilner’s  book  raises  a  broader  issue about  how  histories  of  ideas  and  particularly  histories  of  scientifi c  and  scholarly theories are and should be written. Etkind depicts what he believes is the dominant and the only productive approach to writing a history of scholarly thought. He then critically assesses Mogilner’s work against his own construct. In my comments I will fi rst  question  Etkind’s  perception  of  the  current  state  of  the  historiography  of scientifi c thought and then will try to show how it leads to a misrepresentation of what Mogilner has tried to do.

Кодировка UTF-8 Кодировка WIN-1251 Кодировка KOI8-R

BiBTeX

/text/biblio/35552760/bib

RIS

/text/biblio/35552760/ris