Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Value and Institutional Bases of Posturban Lifestyle in Russia: Hypothes and Empirical Research

русская версия

Опубликовано на портале: 30-03-2016
Based on the results of field sociological studies, the paper analyzes value orientations and the nature of identification of representatives of post-urban life activity forms in contemporary Russia. The authors suggest the hypothesis of new promising forms (their operating name is post-urban ones) of life and activity organization in people's communities having already emerged and been institutionalized. The following signs act as leading ones in this new model of life activity: moving away from the urban binding toward new forms of involvement into the global environment; modern technological solutions – they occupy an important place in models of social and economic activity of post-urbanists; orientation to family and labor model of life support as a principal foundation of the post-urban model. Proceeding from the materials of in-depth interviews, the paper demonstrates that post-urbanization processes take place with and are supported by post-urban type values. The most important of them are the value of uniqueness succeeding the unification one, the value of modern family-based labor and daily life organization (it substitutes the value of factory- and plant-associated aloofness), the value of human-centered technological, social and daily patterns that compete with priorities of machine production and consumption standards, the value of social capital as opposed to urban fragmentation.
PDF Document
сохранить
[713 КБ]
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
А.Ж. Абилов
Социологические исследования. 1998.  № 3. С. 35-42. 
[Статья]
Надежда Николаевна Федотова
Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2006.  Т. 9. № 3.
[Статья]
А. Соседский
Социологические исследования. 1994.  № 6. С. 108-112. 
[Статья]
Andrew Edgar
[Статья глоссария]
Юрий Львович Пивоваров
Общественные науки и современность. 2001.  № 6. С. 101-113. 
[Статья]
Басыр Гайфуллович Акчурин
Социологические исследования. 2001.  № 12. С. 103-108. 
[Статья]
Андрей Васильевич Шипилов
Социологические исследования. 2006.  № 5. С. 103-112. 
[Статья]