American Economic Review
1940 1942 1946 1948 1953 1955 1958 1959 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1980 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1991 1992 1994 1995 1996 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2003Hurvey Leibenstein American Economic Review. 1966. Vol. 56. No. 3. P. 392-416.
Examines empirical evidence on allocative efficiency in economics. Comparison of the merit of allocative efficiency with X-efficiency, an unindentified type of efficiency which has motivation as its major element; Analysis of the magnitude and nature of X-efficiency; View that firms and economies do not operate on an outer-bound possibility surface consistent with their resources. (Из Ebsco)
Contestability vs. competition [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2003William G. Shepherd American Economic Review. 1984. Vol. 74. No. 4. P. 572-587 .
Analyzes the ultra-free entry as normative contribution to industrial organization. Ultra-free entry in context of the evolving field of industrial organization; Assessment of the conceptual validity of William Baumol, Elizabeth Bailey John Panzar and Robert Willig's analysis in representing the nature of competition; Empirical issues in measuring and testing ultra-free entry. (Из Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 18-03-2003William Jack Baumol American Economic Review. 1982. Vol. 72. No. 1. P. 1-15.
Presents a transcript of the presidential address delivered at the 94th Meeting of the American Economic Association on December 29, 1981. Discussion of developments in the theory of industry structure; Welfare attributes of contestable markets behavior; Characteristics of oligopoly equilibrium; Intertemporal vulnerability to inefficient entry. (Из Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 06-02-2003Gerald R. Faulhaber American Economic Review. 1975. Vol. 65. No. 5. P. 966-77.
Analyzes the issues of cross-subsidization in public enterprises with economies of joint production. Incentives to competitive entry and subsidy-free prices; Relation of welfare maximizing prices to subsidy-free prices; Price elasticity of demand; Costs of alternative means of supply; Choice between protected monopoly and open competition.
Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2003Stan J. Liebowitz American Economic Review. 1982. Vol. 72. No. 4. P. 816-824.
Focuses on the relationship between market structure and monopoly power. Durability models; New-used goods model; Durability and monopoly in the new-used model; Interdependence between market structure and durability. (Из Ebsco)
On Monopoly Welfare Losses [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 07-02-2003Abram Bergson American Economic Review. 1973. Vol. 63. No. 5. P. 853-870.
Studies welfare losses due to monopolistic pricing in the United States. Evaluation of calculations indicating that welfare losses from monopolistic pricing is inconsequential; Consumer's surplus analysis; Proposed method in deriving coefficient of net compensating variation. (Из Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2003Richard Schmalensee American Economic Review. 2002. Vol. 71. No. 1. P. 242-247 .
Focuses on output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. Maximization of profits by charging different prices to different markets or classes for customers; Maldistribution of resources for different uses. (From Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2003A. Ross Shepherd American Economic Review. 1971. Vol. 61. No. 1. P. 237-239.
Comments on the article by Milton Kafoglis concerning the output of the restrained firm. Examination of the price and output behavior of the restrained monopoly firm; Implications of private cost saving on output and revenue; Production of optimal output by output and revenue maximizers in the case of increasing cost; Production of optimally large outputs in single markets through monopsony power. (Из Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 02-09-2003Hal R. Varian American Economic Review. 1985. Vol. 75. No. 4. P. 870-875.
Studies the effect of price discrimination on social welfare using methods from duality theory. Features of the reservation model presented; Quasi-linear utility and consumers' surplus; Upper and lower bounds on welfare change; Bounds on welfare change with optimal price discrimination. (From Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 06-02-2003Daniel A. Graham, John M. Vernon American Economic Review. 1975. Vol. 65. No. 5. P. 1032-1036.
Comments on S. Besen and R. Soligo's article about the economics of the network-affiliate relationships in the television broadcasting industry in the U.S. Sale of advertising time on network programs; Supply curve of cleared time; Definition of the nondiscrinating monopsonist solution; Demand for network programming. (Из Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 31-08-2003Anne O. Krueger American Economic Review. 1974. Vol. 64. No. 3. P. 291-303.
Studies the impact of competitive import licenses on the economy. Value of rents associated with import licenses; Relationship between welfare cost of quantitative restrictions and tariff equivalents; Impact of wage legislation on equilibrium levels of unemployment. (Из Ebsco)
Опубликовано на портале: 06-02-2003John Maurice Clark American Economic Review. 1940. Vol. 30. No. 2. P. 241-56.
The paper of which this is an enlarged and revised version was read at a joint Round Table of the American Economic Association and the Econometric Society, during the meetings at Philadelphia, December, 1939. Where one of the conditions of perfect competition is absent, the presence of others may lead to greater rather than less imperfection. Long-run curves of individual demand and cost are flatter than commonly represented, and the imperfections of competition correspondingly less. Industry subject to fluctuating demand requires prices in excess of short-run marginal cost. Favorable conditions appear to include a sloping individual demand curve, and some uncertainty whether a reduction of price will be promptly met. With standardized products, a chaotic market tends toward ruinous competition. Pure oligopoly is seldom found; the important case being that of openly-quoted prices with varying amounts of deviations on actual sales. Standard products with sloping individual demand curves are also possible. While extreme quality differentials approach monopoly, more moderate ones may be workably competitive, especially with further growth of closer substitutes and better knowledge of qualities on the part of buyers.
Weak invisible hand theorems on the sustainabilily of prices in a multiproduct natural monopoly [статья]
Опубликовано на портале: 07-02-2003William Jack Baumol, Elizabeth E. Bailey, Robert D. Willig American Economic Review. 1977. Vol. 67. No. 3. P. 350-65.
Investigates the conditions under which a 'natural monopoly' can find a set of prices and a set of products that are sustainable against competitive entry. Ramsey rule for Pareto optimal pricing under a budget constraint; Relation between subadditivity of costs and sustainability; Conditions sufficient for sustainable prices; Uncertainty of sustainability. (Из Ebsco)