Universities in Transition: Privatization, Decentralization, and Institutional Autonomy as National Policy with Special Reference to the Russian Federation
Опубликовано на портале: 08-12-2003
Within these concepts may lie promises of:
*a more responsive university—to the students, economic enterprises, and governmental agencies that need its students and its research;
*a better managed university—meaning a university that better empowers the individual faculty member and that maximizes the teaching, learning, and scholarship for its available resources;
*a more accessible university, promoting equality and social unity.
It remains possible, however, that out of these same concepts, in North America and Europe, as well as in Russia and other transitional nations, will come increasing austerity, less participation, less academic quality, a fragmentation of the national universities, and a loss of the university’s traditional unifying role that will not serve well the needs of any of these societies. The difference between these two scenarios may lie in the degree to which the government uses privatization, decentralization, and institutional autonomy to create more effective, efficient, and responsive universities—or, in contrast, as a cover for financial disengagement or a general collapse of state authority.
Review of Economic Studies. 2002. Vol. 69. No. 2. P. 437-466.
NBER Working Papers. 2006. No. 11992.
Journal of Banking & Finance. 2005. No. 29. P. 1459-1481.
William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series. 1999. No. 246.
World Bank Poverty Net. 2002.