на главную поиск contacts

Statistics and the Theory of Measurement

Опубликовано на портале: 22-09-2003
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society). 1996.  Vol. 159. No. 3. P. 445-492. 
Тематический раздел:
Just as there are different interpretations of probability, leading to different kinds of inferential statements and different conclusions about statistical models and questions, so there are different theories of measurement, which in turn may lead to different kinds of statistical model and possibly different conclusions. This has led to much confusion and a long running debate about when different classes of statistical methods may legitimately be applied. This paper outlines the major theories of measurement and their relationships and describes the different kinds of models and hypotheses which may be formulated within each theory. One general conclusion is that the domains of applicability of the two major theories are typically different, and it is this which helps apparent contradictions to be avoided in most practical applications.

Ключевые слова

См. также:
David J. Hand, W. E. Henley
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1997.  Vol. 160. No. 3. P. 523-541. 
Фридрих Маркович Бородкин
Мир России. 2004.  Т. 13. № 4. С. 62-101. 
Malay Ghosh, Narinder Nangia, Dal Ho Kim
Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1996.  Vol. 91. No. 436. P. 1423-1431. 
Александр Дмитриевич Смирнов
Экономический журнал ВШЭ. 2000.  Т. 4. № 2. С. 157-183. 
David J. Hand
Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society). 1994.  Vol. 157. No. 3. P. 317-356. 
Виталий Леонидович Тамбовцев
TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2019.  Т. 17. № 3. С. 6-29.