на главную поиск contacts

Debt Restructuring

Опубликовано на портале: 11-11-2004
NBER Working Paper Series. 2000.  w7722.
What difference does it make, and for whom, whether the nonperforming debts of emerging market borrowers are restructured? This paper begins by positing a set of counterfactual conditions under which restructuring would not matter, and then shows how several ways in which the actual world of international lending departs from these conditions give both lenders and borrowers ample reason to care whether nonperforming debts are restructured. One implication of the way in which debt restructuring matters is that restructuring should not be too' easy. Further, with a greater frequency of defaults, some credit flows to emerging market countries would not be extended in the first place. An important element driving this line of argument is moral hazard, but (unlike in much of the recent literature of emerging market debt problems) what is central here is not the availability of credit from the IMF or other official lenders but the more fundamental moral hazard inherent in all uncollateralized borrower-lender relationships.

текст статьи на сайте NBER:
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Michael C. Jensen, William H. Meckling
Journal of Financial Economics. 1976.  Vol. 3. No. 4. P. 305-360. 
Андрей Викторович Сычков
Университетское управление. 2006.  № 1(41). С. 87-91. 
Olav Sorenson, William P. Barnett
Industrial and Corporate Change. 2002.  Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 289-325. 
Gregory N. Mankiw
Sebastian Edwards
NBER Working Paper Series. 2002.  w8939.
Andrew Clarke, Mathilde Maurel
Экономический журнал ВШЭ. 2001.  Т. 5. № 2. С. 179-193. 
Ricardo J. Caballero, Arvind Krishnamurthy
NBER Working Paper Series. 2002.  w8758.