Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Melding Private and Public Interests in Water Rights Markets

Опубликовано на портале: 21-02-2005
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1993.  Vol. 25. No. 1. P. 69-83. 
The debate over pnvatizing and water markets has moved back and forth for decades between the “I” and the “We” perspectives. Rather than either/or, a balanced “I&We” view of water institutions is needed. West is meeting east in water law. Public interest needs must be satisfied in appropriate decision forums, but marketing may prove a social improvement when used as a supplement. Balancing an “I&We” institution involves establishing an acceptable or tolerable level of interference through judicious mixing of state, common and private property regimes. Third party effects are eliminated as mutual gain arises in a variety of decision forums.

Ссылки
статей http://www.agecon.uga.edu/~jaae/jaae.htm
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Д. Н. Емельянов, А. М. Носов, А. В. Дерюгина, В.Г. Растянников, А. А. Барлыбаев, Н. М. Клопыжникова
[Книга]
Safdar Muhammad, Albert J. Allen
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2000.  Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 152-158. 
[Статья]
Римма Павловна Шпакова
Социологические исследования. 2005.  № 11. С. 129-137. 
[Статья]
Brett D. Begemann
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1997.  Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 117-122. 
[Статья]
Leonard Shabman, Kurt Stephenson
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1996.  Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 117-125. 
[Статья]
Gerald Whittaker, Biing-Hwan Lin, Utpal Vasavada
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1995.  Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 352-362. 
[Статья]