Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Small Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Growers in Tennessee: Factors Associated With Their Use of Commercial Outlets

Опубликовано на портале: 04-05-2005
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2000.  Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 39-47. 
Consolidation and technological change are restricting the marketing alternatives for independent, small-volume produce growers. The following are some of the forces restricting small growers: contracting, bar coding, precut processing, increased globalization, HACCP, and efficient consumer response (Epperson and Estes, 1999; Kaufman et al., 2000 forthcoming; Shaffer, 1999). As a result of these and other forces, small volume produce growers tend to be limited to direct outlets (for example, farm stands, PYO, farmer’s markets). Little attention, however, has been given to the marketing choices made by small-volume growers (an exception is Estes, 1985). The focus of this paper is a study that examines the characteristics of the farmer’s operations and their choices of market outlets. The objective of that study was to generate information about the marketing activities of small-volume growers who had, as one of their options, access to organized farmer’s markets.

Ссылки
текст статьи в формате pdf:
http://agecon.lib.umn.edu/cgi-bin/pdf_view.pl?paperid=7515&ftype=.pdf
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Д. Н. Емельянов, А. М. Носов, А. В. Дерюгина, В.Г. Растянников, А. А. Барлыбаев, Н. М. Клопыжникова
[Книга]
Safdar Muhammad, Albert J. Allen
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2000.  Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 152-158. 
[Статья]
Римма Павловна Шпакова
Социологические исследования. 2005.  № 11. С. 129-137. 
[Статья]
Brett D. Begemann
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1997.  Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 117-122. 
[Статья]
Игорь Бирман
Экономическая наука современной России. 2000.  № 2. С. 35-52. 
[Статья]
Leonard Shabman, Kurt Stephenson
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1996.  Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 117-125. 
[Статья]