на главную поиск contacts

Rural Development policies and the Second Pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy /доклад на 87 семинаре ЕААЕ, Assessing Rural Development Policies of the CAP, Vienna, Austria, 21-23 April 2004

Опубликовано на портале: 31-03-2005
This paper tries to bring together the various arguments that make a reform of rural development policies desirable and useful for the stakeholders involved. The policy implications of a desirable reform are also considered. CAP, in its long story has established powerful interest groups in the administrations, in the sector and even in expert’s circles. Past shortcomings of reform attempts suggest that a consensus on reform is difficult to achieve and requires a clear and shared outline of what will agricultural and rural policy look like after the reform process. A transition period, the inclusion of wider interest groups than those directly concerned by the policy, the possibility of regionally adapted versions rural policy appear to be important components for insuring a strengthened support and a more effective policy.

Ключевые слова

См. также:
Д. Н. Емельянов, А. М. Носов, А. В. Дерюгина, В.Г. Растянников, А. А. Барлыбаев, Н. М. Клопыжникова
Safdar Muhammad, Albert J. Allen
Journal of Food Distribution Research. 2000.  Vol. 31. No. 1. P. 152-158. 
Римма Павловна Шпакова
Социологические исследования. 2005.  № 11. С. 129-137. 
Brett D. Begemann
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1997.  Vol. 29. No. 1. P. 117-122. 
Leonard Shabman, Kurt Stephenson
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1996.  Vol. 28. No. 1. P. 117-125. 
Gerald Whittaker, Biing-Hwan Lin, Utpal Vasavada
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 1995.  Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 352-362.