Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Public Sphere and the Legitimacy of Personalistic Regime in Russia

русская версия

Опубликовано на портале: 12-10-2012
Тематический раздел:
According to the given article the main basis of the present political regime’s legitimacy in Russia seems to be the absence of institutionalized citizen’s com-
munication across differences. In the absence of effective political competition and social critically media there is not public communication. This, in
turn, does not generate the collective form of political change’s internalization. A consequence is the private character of political preference formation which rationality is aimed not at improvement of own political knowledge, but on improvement of own material welfare. For this reason the public
sphere institutions/political communication institutions are devaluated as a basis of preference formation in the opinion of most citizens. The exclusion
of the democratic institutions from possible ways to improve one’s personal situation does not conflict with interventions of the authoritarianism.
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
John M. Scheb II, William Lyons
Political Behavior. 2001.  Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 181-194. 
[Статья]
Сергей Александрович Коротаев, Овсей Ирмович Шкаратан
Общественные науки и современность. 2017.  № 4. С. 130–140. 
[Статья]
Matey Dogan
Социологические исследования. 1994.  № 6. С. 147-156. 
[Статья]
Nicolas Abercrombie, Stephen Hill, Bryan Stanley Turner
[Статья глоссария]
Ольга Спиридоновна Белокрылова
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2012.  Т. 4. № 2. С. 128-130. 
[Статья]
Светлана Сергеевна Бодрунова
Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. 2011.  Т. 14. № 1. С. 110-132. 
[Статья]
Jürgen Habermas
[Книга]