Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Bored by the economy... (Two sides of institutionalism)

русская версия

Опубликовано на портале: 09-08-2013
TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2013.  Т. 11. № 2. С. 5-10. 
Institutionalism has firmly established among the social sciences, and it's rather hard today to find an article or a dissertation that can do without (more or less appropriate) the smart adjective - «institutional».Yet, adherents of classical economic school are still embarrassed and on the look-out about the new theory.Certainly, no sane economist would deny that activity of social organizations is affected not only by the influence of economic factors: social factors, including social institutions, make the «social environment» in which these social organizations work.But the approaches of economists and institutionalists to social processes distinguish in another aspect - namely, in assessment of these factors. While economists consider the influence of economic factors to be the primary ones, that is, determinative for institutional factors (as the secondary ones) as well, - institutionalists aim at institutional factors' description as equal to economic factors. Such a standpoint favours the institutional theory to be lifted in the hierarchy of social sciences.What are, then, the « pluses» and the «minuses» of institutionalism?The author focuses on general and special features of the methodology of economic and institutional knowledge.
PDF Document
сохранить
[246 КБ]
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
О.В. Карамова
Вопросы экономики и права. 2012.  № 3. С. 59-64. 
[Статья]
Вилен Леонидович Перламутров
Экономическая наука современной России. 2001.  № 3. С. 156-158. 
[Статья]
Андрей Андреевич Гриценко, Владимир Валентинович Липов
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2020.  Т. 12. № 2. С. 132-148. 
[Статья]
Светлана Борисовна Авдашева, Андрей Евгеньевич Шаститко, Борис Викторович Кузнецов
Российский журнал менеджмента. 2006.  Т. 4. № 4. С. 3-22. 
[Статья]
Александр Андреевич Мальцев
Общественные науки и современность. 2018.  № 3. С. 122–137. 
[Статья]