Эксоцман
на главную поиск contacts

Entrepreneurs As a Subject of Modern Russian Economy Development: General Characteristics and «Resource Type» Regions Specificity

русская версия

Опубликовано на портале: 27-06-2016
Тематический раздел:
Nowadays, special urgency has the question about the ability of entrepreneurs to act as a subject of the Russian economy development. Analysis of the specificity of targets and resource potential of the modern Russian entrepreneurs is fulfilled in the context of the general features of entrepreneurship development in the countries with "emerging markets". Distinction between "politicized" entrepreneurs, as prevailing type of entrepreneurs in these countries, and "classic" entrepreneurs is shown. Two basic strategies of their behavior in the form of "rent-seeking" and "institutional" entrepreneurship are highlighted. Incentives and constraints of "institutional" entrepreneurship strategies selection made by "politicized" entrepreneurs are considered in the context of assessing the potential of the Russian entrepreneurs as a subject of economic development as well as emerging positive externalities. Analysis is regionalized to consider the specificity of the behavior of entrepreneurs in the economy of the "resource type" regions. Models of "enclave dual economy" and "integrated regional economy" are discrete structural alternatives for "resource type" regions development. "Sectoral" frontiers of net positive externalities that emerge from institutional entrepreneurs’ activity related to the implementation of productive configurations institutions are considered as well as a choice between the "rent-seeking" and "institutional" entrepreneurship. Kemerovo region and Krasnoyarsk region are the basic regions to analyze incentives and constraints of entrepreneurs in the economy of the "resource type" regions. The authors use sociological tools in the form of semi-structured interviews. Initial evaluation of the eight entrepreneurs’ strategies of Kemerovo region and Krasnoyarsk region shows that the most of them used elements of the institutional entrepreneurs’ strategy and focused on the diversification of the regional economy. At the same time, the presence of individual achievements does not mean a significant improvement in the conditions for the development of productive entrepreneurship. The lack of an effective system of communications between institutional entrepreneurs and decision-making representatives of regional authorities is the key problem.
PDF Document
сохранить
[671 КБ]
BiBTeX
RIS
Ключевые слова

См. также:
Сергей Николаевич Левин, Кирилл Сергеевич Саблин, Елена Сергеевна Каган
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2017.  Т. 9. № 3. С. 119-132. 
[Статья]
Игорь Сергеевич Пыжев, В.Н. Руцкий
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2018.  Т. 10. № 1. С. 125-136. 
[Статья]
Сергей Николаевич Левин, Елена Сергеевна Каган, Кирилл Сергеевич Саблин
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2015.  Т. 7. № 3. С. 92-101. 
[Статья]
Маргарита Владимировна Курбатова, Сергей Николаевич Левин, Елена Сергеевна Каган, Дмитрий Викторович Кислицын
TERRA ECONOMICUS. 2019.  Т. 17. № 3. С. 89-106. 
[Статья]
Сергей Николаевич Левин, Кирилл Сергеевич Саблин
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2018.  Т. 10. № 4. С. 97-111. 
[Статья]
Сергей Николаевич Левин, Дмитрий Викторович Кислицын, Анна Александровна Сурцева
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2019.  Т. 11. № 4. С. 61-76. 
[Статья]
В.Н. Руцкий, Игорь Сергеевич Пыжев
Journal of Institutional Studies (Журнал институциональных исследований). 2015.  Т. 7. № 4. С. 128-137. 
[Статья]